

- 6 CORES MAC MINI FASTER THAN 8 CORE MAC PRO HOW TO
- 6 CORES MAC MINI FASTER THAN 8 CORE MAC PRO FULL
- 6 CORES MAC MINI FASTER THAN 8 CORE MAC PRO PRO
PCMark Office tests were twice as fast on the new stock Mac Pro and graphics tests showed the dual AMD FirePro D500 GPUs in the new Mac Pro pushing twice as many frames per second in the Heaven graphics benchmark at 1280 by 720 resolutions than the 12-core Mac Pro with its Radeon HD 5770 graphics. Our file copy test was more than 4 times as fast on the new Mac Pro’s PCI-connected flash storage than on the 12-core system’s 7200 rpm drives. The new Mac Pro was faster in every test except the Cinebench CPU test, which was 10 percent faster on the 12-core system.

The YouTuber’s final words are “overall it’s just crazy how good it performs.” For light music production needs as well, the mini did a decent job. It beat the Intel Mac Pro in coding, while photos and video editing performance was the same on both. However 4K & 8K RED RAW playback and export were not that great.Īlthough there is a big difference in the CPU of both the machines, the M1 Mac mini did a fine job. When transcoding an HEVC 10-BIT file, the Mac Mini was smoked by the Mac Pro by completing the task 17 minutes after. R5 10 BIT playback was smooth on Mac mini and the export was faster by 5 minutes 21 seconds. In addition, 4K H.264 video editing was the same on both machines and in exporting 5 min 4K H.264 file, Pro was slightly faster by 34 seconds. Tested in Final Cut, video editing on Mac Pro was 2x faster but M1 Mac mini was 2x faster in completing 1 min HEVC Stabilization. However, Mac Pro exported 50 42MP images in half the time taken by Mac mini. In a few tests, the 2020 Mac mini was slightly more responsive than the 2019 Mac Pro. Even on Rosetta 2, the photos editing experience like moving sliders and making adjustments was just the same on Mac mini as on the Mac Pro. The YouTuber used Lightroom Classic for photos editing test which has not yet been optimized for the M1 chip and ran through Rosetta 2 translation. Although the number of tracks is far less, for a machine its size, the M1 Mac mini performed wonderfully. However, in the audio production test on Logic Pro X, the 2020 Mac mini crashed after 90 tracks while Mac Pro ran 227 tracks. Completely optimized for M1, Xcode ran faster on the Apple Silicon Mac mini and completed the test 5 seconds earlier than Intel Mac Pro. However, it was 72% faster in web browsing tests on Speedometer 2.0 in Safari. ProcessorĬomparing the SSD storage, Apple Silicon Mac mini’s Blackmagic SSD test (read and write) scores were slightly behind the 12-core Mac Pro. Having said that, the Youtuber was impressed with the super low power consumption by the 2020 Mac mini. With the aforementioned graphics, the 2016 Mac Pro gave 2 times better performance than the 2020 Mac mini in the gaming test. Moving on to graphics, the Intel Mac Pro on Vega II 32GB had four times better performance than the Apple silicon Mac mini on 16GB.

6 CORES MAC MINI FASTER THAN 8 CORE MAC PRO FULL
The thermal test revealed that even at full load, it was still less hot than Mac Pro. The M1 Mac mini just consumed 13 watts this is mind-blowingly low consumption partially due to its 5nm architecture against Intel chip’s 14nm.īecause of lower power consumption, the M1 Mac mini stays cooler than its predecessor. ProcessorĪlthough Mac Pro’s multi-core scores were impressive, the tester was expecting more due to the higher 193 watts consumption of the bigger machine. The scores for the single-core performance were surprisingly higher on the M1 Mac mini but in multi-core performance, Mac Pro was ahead by 63% in Geekbench and 83% in Cinebench scores.
6 CORES MAC MINI FASTER THAN 8 CORE MAC PRO HOW TO
How to manage notifications for messages on iPhoneīeginning with processors, put Apple Silicon Mac mini with an 8-core CPU (4 high-performance and 4 high-efficiency cores) up against Mac Pro 3.3GHz 12-core Intel Xeon W.
